Selasa, 26 Juni 2012

Swine Flu Deaths In 2009 Topped Quarter Million, Study

Swine Flu Deaths In 2009 Topped Quarter Million, Study

Featured Article
Academic Journal
Main Category: Swine Flu
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines;  Flu / Cold / SARS
Article Date: 26 Jun 2012 - 2:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions   <!-- rate icon rate article Advertisement


Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated

Article opinions: 1 posts
Deaths worldwide from the 2009 influenza H1N1 "swine flu" pandemic are likely to be nearer 280,000, some 15 times more than the 18,500 reported from confirmed lab tests, suggests a new study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases this week.

For the study, led by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, researchers developed a new model using flu data from 12 low, middle, and high income countries.

The figures they used were based on flu diagnosed from patients' symptoms and not from lab tests.

In their model they assumed that the risk of death from flu is higher in some countries that in others, and they calculated respiratory deaths associated with the 2009 H1N1 virus differently to the cardiovascular deaths linked to the pandemic.

They estimate that globally there were 201,200 respiratory deaths (ranging from 105,700 to 395,000), and 83,300 cardiovascular deaths (46,000 to 179,900) associated with 2009 pandemic H1N1 flu virus.

These figures are some 15 times higher than reported laboratory-confirmed deaths, write the authors.

"80% of the respiratory and cardiovascular deaths were in people younger than 65 years and 59% occurred in southeast Asia and Africa," they note.

The researchers suggest some problems with availability of data in the low income countries may affect the accuracy of these estimates.

However, despite these shortcomings, they conclude that a disproportionate number of estimated pandemic deaths may have occurred in lower income countries, and called for more effort to target vaccine production and supply to them in future pandemics.

In an accompanying editorial, Cecile Viboud of the National Institutes of Health and Lone Simonsen of George Washington University, suggest these estimates highlight the difficult problem of trying to keep track of a pandemic as it runs its course.

Lab-confirmed deaths hugely under-estimate the real number of deaths because there is a lack of routine testing and problems with identifying flu-related deaths, they note.

Another study in the same issue of the journal highlights the success of Scotland's vaccination campaign during the H1N1 pandemic.

In that study, researchers estimated vaccine effectiveness in a nationally representative sample of the Scottish population.

In their paper they describe how the pandemic H1N1 vaccination program started in the third week of October 2009, and by the end of January 2010, just over 38,000 people (15%) were vaccinated, leaving 85% unvaccinated.

They calculate that the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing emergency hospital admissions from flu-related disorders was 19.5%, and the vaccine's effectiveness in preventing lab-confirmed flu was 77%.

In their conclusion they write:

"Pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza vaccination was associated with protection against pandemic influenza and a reduction in hospital admissions from influenza-related disorders in Scotland during the 2009-10 pandemic.

In August 2010, after it had been reported in over 200 countries, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that the world is in a "post-pandemic" period with respect to H1N1 swine flu, but the virus is still circulating.

H1N1 was included in the 2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccines in the US, the UK and many other countries.

Seasonal flu kills between 250,000 and 500,000 people worldwide every year, according to WHO.

Written by Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

"Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study"; Fatimah S Dawood, A Danielle Iuliano, Carrie Reed, Martin I Meltzer, David K Shay, Po-Yung Cheng, Don Bandaranayake, Robert F Breiman, W Abdullah Brooks, Philippe Buchy, Daniel R Feikin, Karen B Fowler, Aubree Gordon, Nguyen Tran Hien, Peter Horby, Q Sue Huang, Mark A Katz, Anand Krishnan, Renu Lal, Joel M Montgomery, Kåre Mølbak, Richard Pebody, Anne M Presanis, Hugo Razuri, Anneke Steens, Yeny O Tinoco, Jacco Wallinga, Hongjie Yu, Sirenda Vong, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson; The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Early Online Publication, 26 June 2012; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70121-4; Link to Abstract
"Effectiveness of H1N1 vaccine for the prevention of pandemic influenza in Scotland, UK: a retrospective observational cohort study"; Colin R Simpson, Lewis D Ritchie, Chris Robertson, Aziz Sheikh, Jim McMenamin; The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Early Online Publication, 26 June 2012; DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70133-0; Link to Abstract.
Additional source: WHO Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Citizen

posted by Cindy on 26 Jun 2012 at 4:30 am

This is now the third article that I have read this morning about the H1N1 pandemic and the new findings. I am trying to piece together what the statistics actually mean. I would like to see the raw data or a link to it. For example, I've read that up to 33% of those infected (in Peru) were children but is this children as in under 18 years? And why Peru?

Were the same numbers experienced outside of Peru and if so, why single out Peru? This particular article states that the vaccine was 19.5% effective in preventing emergency hospital admissions for flu-related disorders among the Scottish population but 77% effective in preventing lab confirmed cases of H1N1. These numbers seem incongruous. Does this mean that 80.5% of those admitted to the hospital (emergency admissions) had actually been vaccinated?

Does it mean that 77% of those who actually had lab testing and had the vaccine got the flu but not the swine flu or were they just routinely tested t o test the efficacy of the vaccine. Alternatively, does this mean that 23% of those vaccinated actually tested positive for the swine flu?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Swine Flu Deaths In 2009 Topped Quarter Million, Study'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



MediLexicon International Ltd Logo

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2012 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Everyday Health Network back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd Logo MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2012 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar