Rabu, 06 Juni 2012

Guilt In Depression Has Different Brain Response, Suggesting Freud Was Right

Guilt In Depression Has Different Brain Response, Suggesting Freud Was Right

Featured Article
Academic Journal
Main Category: Depression
Also Included In: MRI / PET / Ultrasound;  Psychology / Psychiatry;  Neurology / Neuroscience
Article Date: 06 Jun 2012 - 2:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions   <!-- rate icon rate article
Patient / Public:4 stars

3.77 (13 votes)

Healthcare Prof:1 star

1 (2 votes)

Article opinions: 4 posts
The brains of people with depression, even in remission, respond differently to feelings of guilt, suggesting Freud was right, said researchers from the University of Manchester in the UK who compared magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of people with a history of depression to those of people who had never had it. If further tests prove successful, they suggest the finding could lead to the first brain scan marker for future risk of depression.

The new study, part-funded by the Medical Research Council was published on 4 June in an online-first issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry.

It is the first piece of research to show there is a brain mechanism behind Freud's classical idea that depression differs from normal sadness by proneness to exaggerated feelings of guilt or self-blame.

Dr Roland Zahn, from the University's School of Psychological Sciences, told the press:

"For the first time, we chart the regions of the brain that interact to link detailed knowledge about socially appropriate behavior - the anterior temporal lobe - with feelings of guilt - the subgenual region of the brain - in people who are prone to depression."

For their study, Zahn and colleagues took fMRI scans of people while they imagined themselves or their best friend acting badly (eg in a mean, tactless or bossy way) towards others, and said what they felt, for instance, guilt, shame, contempt, or disgust, and whether this was toward self or another.

The participants were 25 people who had been in remission from depression for over a year (16 of whom were not currently taking anti-depressants), and 22 healthy volunteers with no history of depression who served as controls.

Previous studies have suggested that the subgenual cingulate cortex and adjacent septal region (SCSR) become active when we feel guilty, and in healthy people with a low risk of depression, this effect is "selective relative to equally unpleasant feelings associated with blaming others (indignation/anger)", write the researchers.

The anterior temporal lobe (ATL) has also been consistently implicated in moral feelings such as guilt, but unlike the SCSR, this part of the brain is "activated irrespective of the type of moral feeling, whether it is guilt or indignation", they note.

There is also evidence to suggest the right superior ATL is important for constructing social concepts that help us make different judgements (eg such as distinguishing merely critical from fault-finding behavior). This in turn protects us against over-generalization and self-blame (eg my pointing out a typing error in a colleague's piece of writing means "I am critical" as opposed to "I am unlikable").

So, prior to this latest study, it had already been proposed, but not shown, that a coupling between these two brain areas, or "ATL-SCSR functional coupling", helps people with low risk of depression blame themselves in an "adaptive" way, without damaging their self-worth or hating themselves.

Zahn and colleagues found the fMRI scans showed the coupling between these brain regions was weaker in the group with a history of depression than in the healthy controls with no history of depression.

"We corroborated the prediction of a guilt-selective reduction in ATL-SCSR coupling in MDD [major depressive disorder] vs controls ... and revealed additional medial frontopolar, right hippocampal, and lateral hypothalamic areas of decoupling while controlling for medication status and intensity of negative emotions," they write.

They also found that lower levels of ATL-SCSR coupling were linked with higher scores on a validated measure of overgeneralized self-blame.

"Interestingly, this 'decoupling' only occurs when people prone to depression feel guilty or blame themselves, but not when they feel angry or blame others," explained Zahn.

"This could reflect a lack of access to details about what exactly was inappropriate about their behaviour when feeling guilty, thereby extending guilt to things they are not responsible for and feeling guilty for everything," he suggested.

Zahn and colleagues suggest the finding is important because it shows there are brain mechanisms that may explain why some people respond to stress with depression rather than aggression.

The team is now testing whether these findings can predict the risk of depression following remission. If they succeed, this could lead to the first fMRI marker for risk of future depression.

Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Continuing Psychiatric Drug Epidemic?

posted by Ben on 6 Jun 2012 at 7:09 am

I agree with Marjorie Roswell.

It is no longer possible to suppress the decades of evidence that the psychiatric narcotics we force upon our citizens have, in fact, been the proximate cause of the damage and brain changes highlighted in studies such as this.

Studies where supposedly competent researchers have compromised themselves time, and time again. Reaching fallacious conclusions, often completely ignoring their own data.

It is an unforgivable breach of public trust. And, I fear, one of the greatest crimes in human history.

It is ironic that this study might provide some limited useful psychological insights were it not for the taint that Psychiatry itself has cast on the whole field.

Sincerely,
A Concerned Sceptic

| post followup | alert a moderator |


At last

posted by Harold on 6 Jun 2012 at 6:42 am

Research in the area of "mental" illnesses is finally increasing. Sharing of research is as well. Hopefully with this increase, answers will follow, as they have for many physical illnesses.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


The 25 people were not even a homogenous sample

posted by Dr. K on 6 Jun 2012 at 5:27 am

Since when does a sample of 25 people allow a researcher to validate or refute anything, Freud included?

The 25 people were not even a homogenous sample. 16 were "not taking anti-depressants", which means that 11 probably were. So how can they be lumped together?

This might be the start of good research. But the writer, as a PhD researcher, should know better than to make sweeping generalizations with such a minuscule sample size.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


possible drug side-effect? Guilt In Depression Has Different Brain Response, Suggesting Freud Was Right

posted by Marjorie Roswell on 6 Jun 2012 at 4:55 am

How do we know the impact wasn't just the side effects of taking antidepressant drugs?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Guilt In Depression Has Different Brain Response, Suggesting Freud Was Right'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



MediLexicon International Ltd Logo

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2012 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Everyday Health Network back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd Logo MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2012 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar